Interactive Breastfeeding Scale: reliability assessment
Escala Interactiva de la Lactancia Materna: evaluación de la confiabilidade
Escala Interativa de Amamentação: avaliação da confiabilidade
Cândida Caniçali Primo; Marcos Antônio Gomes Brandão; Julia Marina Siman Dias; Luciana Graziela de Godoi; Nátaly Jiménez Monroy; Fabiola Zanetti Resende; Eliane de Fátima Almeida Lima
Abstract
Objective: to assess the Interactive Breastfeeding Scale reliability.
Method: a methodological study that followed the third stage of Pasquali’s method for the elaboration of scales, carried out with 216 postpartum women at a university hospital in southeastern Brazil. To assess reliability, percentage of agreement (pa) above 80%, the weighted Kappa (Kp), Gwet’s second-order agreement coefficient (AC2) and Cronbach’s alpha were used.
Results: the percentage of agreement was 83.33%; the overall Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.67; the AC2 coefficient with quadratic and linear weights obtained near-perfect reliability.
Conclusion and implication for practice: the Interactive Breastfeeding Scale reliability assessment was high, and it was confirmed by the results that ensure instrument quality in the population studied, proving to be a reliable and valid instrument to assess factors that interfere in the mother-child interaction while breastfeeding.
Keywords
Resumen
Palabras clave
Resumo
Objetivo: avaliar a confiabilidade da Escala Interativa de Amamentação.
Método: estudo metodológico, que seguiu a terceira etapa do método de Pasquali para elaboração de escalas, desenvolvido com 216 puérperas, em hospital universitário da região Sudeste do Brasil. Para avaliação da confiabilidade, foram utilizados o percentual de concordância (pa) acima de 80%, o Kappa ponderado (Kp), a second-order agreement coefficient (AC2) de Gwet e o alfa de Cronbach.
Resultados: o percentual de concordância dos itens foi de 83,33%; o valor global do alfa de Cronbach foi de 0,67; o coeficiente AC2 com ponderações quadrática e linear obteve a confiabilidade quase perfeita.
Conclusão e implicação para a prática: a avaliação da confiabilidade da Escala Interativa de Amamentação foi alta, e foi confirmada pelos resultados que asseguram a qualidade do instrumento na população estudada, mostrando-se um instrumento confiável e válido para avaliar os fatores que interferem na interação mãe-filho durante a amamentação.
Palavras-chave
Referências
1 Bomer-Norton C. Breastfeeding: a holistic concept analysis. Public Health Nurs. 2014;31(1):88-96.
2 Gianni ML, Bettinelli ME, Manfra P, Sorrentino G, Bezze E, Plevani L et al. Breastfeeding difficulties and risk for early breastfeeding cessation. Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2266.
3 Primo CC, Brandão MAG. Interactive theory of breastfeeding: creation and application of a middle-range theory. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017;70(6):1191-8.
4 Witten C, Claasen N, Kruger HS, Coutsoudis A, Grobler H. Psychosocial barriers and enablers of exclusive breastfeeding: lived experiences of mothers in low-income townships, North West Province, South Africa. Int Breastfeed J. 2020;26(15):76.
5 Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016;387(10017):491-504.
6 Casal CS, Lei A, Young SL, Tuthill EL. A critical review of instruments measuring breastfeeding attitudes, knowledge, and social support. J Hum Lact. 2017;33(1):21-47.
7 Souza CON, Ruchdeschel T, Resende FZ, Leite FMC, Brandão MAG, Primo CC. Interactive breastfeeding scale: proposition based on the middle-range theory of nursing. Esc Anna Nery. 2018;22(3):e20170213.
8 Primo CC, Henrique LR, Bertazo QS, Resende FZ, Leite FMC, Brandão MAG. Validation of the “Interactive Breastfeeding Scale”: theoretical and empirical analysis. Esc Anna Nery. 2020;24(1):e20190207.
9 Medeiros RKS, Ferreira Jr MA, Pinto DPSR, Vitor AF, Santos VEP, Barichello E. Modelo de validação de conteúdo de Pasquali nas pesquisas em Enfermagem. Rev Enf Ref. 2015;serIV(4):127-35.
10 Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):96-106.
11 Gwet KL. Handbook of inter-rater reliability. 4th ed. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics Press; 2014.
12 Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB, Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59.
13 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 mar;33(1):159-74.
14 Tong F, Tang S, Irby BJ, Lara-Alecio R, Guerrero C. The determination of appropriate coefficient indices for inter-rater reliability: using classroom observation instruments as fidelity measures in large-scale randomized research. Int J Educ Res. 2020;99:101514.
15 Markovsky B, Webster M. Theory construction. In: Ritzer G, editor. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. 457 p. (vol. 11).
16 Batista CL, Ribeiro VS, Nascimento MD, Rodrigues VP. Association between pacifier use and bottle-feeding and unfavorable behaviors during breastfeeding. J Pediatr. 2018;94(6):596-601.
17 Rocha GP, Oliveira MCF, Ávila LBB, Longo GZ, Cotta RMM, Araújo RMA. Condicionantes da amamentação exclusiva na perspectiva materna. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34(6):e00045217.
18 Alves YR, Couto LL, Barreto ACM, Quitete JB. Breastfeeding under the umbrella of support networks: a facilitative strategy. Esc Anna Nery. 2020;24(1):e20190017.
19 Younas A, Quennell S. Usefulness of nursing theory‐guided practice: an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019;33(3):540-55.
Submetido em:
06/04/2022
Aceito em:
08/09/2022
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email